|
NEWS

News and Press Releases
"Bad" Nursing Home Survey
Reversed on Administrative Appeal
Jane
Thornton Mastrucci and Cynthia
Harrison Ruiz of QMPW have received a very favorable
decision in an administrative appeal of a bad nursing
home survey by the Center for Medicare & Medicaid
Services (CMS).
In Palm Beach County Home v. CMS (Case
No. C-99-102, H.H.S., DAB, Civil Remedies Div., October
29, 2001), the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) reversed
all three tags, and held that CMS had no basis to deny
payments for new admissions to the facility. The case
was tried in June 2001 by Jane Mastrucci and her father
and former law partner, John W. Thornton, while Cindie
Ruiz co-authored the pre- and post-trial briefs with
Mrs. Mastrucci.
During the trial, the ALJ refused to hear
testimony regarding the facility's written policy on
discharge and discharge planning, certain medications,
and an alleged leg fracture requiring nursing care since
there were no allegations regarding these topics in
the survey. He also refused to admit into evidence or
hear testimony on prior surveys, other residents not
at issue in the case, or the reputation of the facility.
With respect to survey tag F201, the Judge
ruled that the nursing home justifiably transferred
a resident to an unregulated facility (a residential
Salvation Army) since his continued presence at the
nursing home endangered not only the safety of other
residents, but the nursing home's own staff. The resident
in question was a 35-year-old, homeless, male resident
who had made a significant recovery (from a significant
head injury and numerous fractures) while at the nursing
home over a nine-month period. As the man recovered,
he became increasingly violent and aggressive, and was
ultimately discharged after an unprovoked attack on
another resident and a Certified Nursing Assistant.
The ALJ further held that F224, Abuse,
dealt with facility abuse of residents, not "resident-to-resident
abuse," and contained no requirement that the facility
report "resident-to-resident abuse" to police
or local abuse hotlines. He also ruled there was NO
evidence of facility abuse.
Finally, the ALJ held that while F329
requires "adequate" monitoring of the side
effects of psychotropic drugs, daily monitoring is not
required unless there is a medical basis for daily monitoring.
Moreover, he ruled that there is no requirement that
a specific form be used to document the monitoring (such
as a Psychoactive Drug Flow Record). The ALJ also held
that the absence of side effects need not be recorded,
and that monitoring is not required to be documented.
Rather, the focus of the regulation is that the resident
be adequately monitored, and that the physician be kept
adequately informed of the condition of the resident.
December 2001
|